Book Reviews

Book Review: Daniel Defoe’s Robinson Crusoe

0
Please log in or register to do it.

Daniel Defoe’s Robinson Crusoe (1719) opens with a rebellious young man ignoring his father’s warnings. Crusoe’s dad begs him to embrace a quiet, middle-class life—steady, God-fearing, rooted in duty. But Crusoe, hungry for adventure and riches, bolts. He boards a ship, gets enslaved, escapes, becomes a plantation owner, and then—after another reckless sea voyage—gets shipwrecked on a remote island. Alone. For 28 years. That’s the setup. But this isn’t Survivor: 18th Century Edition. It’s a story about pride, providence, and what happens when God strips a man of everything to show him what truly matters.

Let’s break it down. Crusoe’s early life is a masterclass in arrogance. He spurns his father’s counsel (sound familiar, Prodigal Son fans?), chases wealth, and treats divine warnings—storms, slavery, even prophetic dreams—like inconveniences. Then the island happens. No servants, no shortcuts, no distractions. Just a Bible salvaged from the wreckage and the crushing weight of his own folly. What does he do? He doesn’t “manifest” positivity or journal about his feelings. He builds a hut. He learns to farm. He hunts. He reads Scripture. And slowly, his heart shifts. The man who once mocked his father’s piety starts marking days by prayer, calling his isolation a “deliverance” from his former life. Defoe’s message? Sometimes God has to wreck you to save you.

The plot’s genius lies in its simplicity. No subplots, no ensemble cast—just Crusoe vs. nature, Crusoe vs. himself. Every detail matters. Take the famous scene where he finds a single sprout of barley. He’d tossed aside some husks months earlier, assuming they were trash. Now, here’s food growing miraculously. Crusoe doesn’t shrug it off. He falls to his knees, weeping at God’s mercy. Compare that to modern tales where heroes credit “luck” or their own brilliance. Defoe’s point? Providence isn’t subtle. It’s the hand that feeds you, even when you’re too stubborn to see it.

Then there’s the journal. Crusoe documents his days—not for clout, but to track God’s faithfulness. He tallies blessings: “I am alive. I am not starved. I am surrounded by beasts, yet none have harmed me.” Imagine that—a man with nothing writing gratitude lists. Modern protagonists would’ve rage-quit by Chapter 3. Not Crusoe. His isolation forces him to confront his soul. He calls his past life a “sin,” not just a mistake. He repents for greed, rebellion, and treating his parents’ wisdom as contemptible. When’s the last time a character in a bestseller said, “I was wrong. I need forgiveness”?

But let’s get real: the island isn’t paradise. Crusoe battles sickness, fear, and despair. In his darkest hour, delirious with fever, he cracks open the Bible and reads a verse that guts him: “Call on Me in the day of trouble, and I will deliver you.” No therapy speak, no empowerment mantras. Just raw, bleeding faith. He prays for the first time in years—not a polite “bless me” but a howl of repentance. And that’s when his transformation begins. His physical labor—building, planting, exploring—becomes an act of worship. Defoe ties survival to sanctification: you work because God sustains you, not in spite of Him.

Now, contrast this with modern storytelling. Today’s heroes “find themselves” by rejecting tradition, indulging desires, or blaming everyone but themselves. Crusoe’s arc is the inverse: he finds himself by surrendering to God. His greatest triumph isn’t taming the island—it’s kneeling in humility. Defoe doesn’t sugarcoat the grind, either. Crusoe fails. A lot. His first crops die. His canoe’s too heavy to move. He cowers in fear at thunderstorms. But each failure drives him back to prayer, not bitterness. Where’s that grit in today’s fiction? Replaced by characters who quit at the first setback and call it “self-care.”

The book’s power lies in its lack of nuance. Defoe doesn’t dabble in moral gray areas. Sin is sin. Repentance is nonnegotiable. Grace is earned through faith, not works—take that, Catholic sacraments. Crusoe’s not a superhero. He’s a flawed, relatable man whose survival hinges on clinging to God’s promises. That’s why modern readers squirm. This isn’t a hero who “evolves” into doubting truth. He starts blind and ends seeing. How radical in an age where every story’s climax is “the truth was inside you all along.”

After years of isolation, Crusoe stumbles upon a human mark—and loses his mind. Fear paralyzes him. He fortifies his home, stockpiles weapons, and spirals into paranoia. Why? Because the footprint isn’t just a plot twist—it’s a divine test. Will Crusoe trust God’s protection, or cave to fear? Modern writers would’ve turned this into a commentary on “otherness” or colonial guilt. Defoe? He makes it a crisis of faith. Crusoe’s terror exposes his lingering self-reliance. He’s built a kingdom on the island, but one footprint shatters his illusion of control. Sound familiar? How many of us crumble when God pokes our idols?

Then come the cannibals. Crusoe discovers savages feasting on human flesh mere miles from his home. His reaction? Not “cultural relativism.” Not “respecting their traditions.” He vomits. He prays. He wrestles with whether to slaughter them all. Defoe doesn’t sanitize evil. These aren’t “misunderstood” villains—they’re evil. When Crusoe finally rescues a victim (Friday), it’s not to virtue-signal. It’s a raw, bloody act of defiance against darkness. Compare that to modern stories where heroes hesitate to call evil evil. Defoe’s message? Truth doesn’t negotiate.

Friday’s arrival shifts everything. Crusoe doesn’t “learn” from him; he teaches him. He schools Friday in English, Scripture, and labor—not as a master, but as a spiritual father. Their bond isn’t built on equality (Friday starts as a “savage”), but on transformation. Friday embraces Christ, renounces cannibalism, and becomes Crusoe’s loyal friend. Modern critics howl: “Colonialist! Oppressor!” But they miss the point. This isn’t about race—it’s about redemption. Friday isn’t “civilized”; he’s saved. Defoe’s vision is pure Gospel: one broken man leading another to light. Where’s that boldness today? Buried under a pile of political correctness.

Here’s where Defoe guts Catholic theology. Crusoe doesn’t pray to Mary or beg a priest for absolution. He kneels alone, Bible in hand, and finds grace through faith alone. When Friday asks, “Why God no kill devil?” Crusoe doesn’t cite Aquinas or church dogma. He points to Christ’s victory on the cross. Sola fide. Sola Scriptura. Defoe’s Protestant bones scream through every page. Modern “faith” stories dilute the Gospel into self-help drivel—believe in yourself! Crusoe’s faith is bloody, costly, rooted in repentance. No wonder it offends.

The book’s climax (no spoilers) isn’t about escape or revenge. It’s about surrender. Crusoe’s greatest victory isn’t taming the island—it’s kneeling before God’s sovereignty. He stops seeing himself as the hero of his story and becomes a vessel. Modern fiction would call this “toxic.” Defoe calls it truth.

Conclusion: Read This Book. Then Read THE Book.

Let’s be clear: Robinson Crusoe isn’t entertainment. It’s a challenge. A gut-check. Defoe’s world—where sin has teeth, repentance is nonnegotiable, and God’s providence hurts—is a foreign language to modern readers. We prefer stories that coddle our egos, not crucify them.

But here’s the antidote: read Defoe. Then read the Bible. Let Crusoe’s journey drive you to Psalms—the raw cries of a man clinging to God in the storm. Let his failures send you to Proverbs—the wisdom he ignored until it nearly killed him. Let his redemption point you to Christ, the true Savior Crusoe’s faith whispers of but doesn’t name.

The world’s drowning in stories that flatter your rebellion. This one? It’ll wreck you. And if you let it, it’ll save you.

Book Review: Graham Greene’s The Power and the Glory
Book Review: Donald Trump’s The Art of the Deal 

Reactions

0
0
0
0
0
0
Already reacted for this post.