Book Reviews Lifestyle

Is “Mind Over Medicine” by Lissa Rankin Dangerous Codswallop? Yep!

0
Please log in or register to do it.

Look, I’ll give Lissa Rankin this: she’s smart. Smart enough to know how to hook you. She starts “Mind Over Medicine” talking like a proper doctor – because she is one apprently – and she lays down some genuinely unsettling facts about how chronic stress absolutely wrecks your body. We’re not talking about feeling a bit tense; she spells out the real, measurable, biological carnage: cortisol flooding your system 24/7, inflammation raging, your immune system taking a battering, your body’s natural repair mechanisms shutting down. It’s terrifying stuff, backed by actual science she cites. She argues, convincingly, that feeling perpetually trapped, isolated, hopeless, or just plain miserable isn’t just unpleasant – it’s a direct, physical assault on your health. That bit? It lands. It makes you look at your own constant low-level stress or exhaustion and think, gosh, is this slowly killing me? She sets the hook deep with legit physiology, showing how your brain’s perception directly dictates your body’s chemical reality. Fine. Point taken. Stress is poison. Belief matters. Got it.

But here’s where the con starts. Having reeled you in with cold, hard medical reality and the authority of her MD, Rankin does a breathtaking bait-and-switch. Almost seamlessly, the book shifts. The rigorous science gets slowly crowded out by whispers of “energy,” “vibrations,” and “quantum entanglement.” Suddenly, we’re not just talking about lowering cortisol through proven methods; we’re veering headlong into the murky, unregulated, and frankly dangerous swamp of “alternative medicine.” She starts weaving in anecdotes – presented with wide-eyed credulity – about people “spontaneously” curing terminal cancer through sheer positive thinking or some bloke waving his hands over their “energy field.” Hold on a bloody minute. She uses her medical credentials like a shield, lending false legitimacy to utter quackery. It’s insidious. It’s manipulative. It’s predatory.

She dedicates significant space to concepts like “intuitive healing,” “chakra balancing,” and “distant energy work,” discussing them with the same sober tone she used for the stress research. This is not science. This is magical thinking. It is fundamentally dishonest for a trained physician to present this speculative, evidence-free nonsense alongside actual biomedical data as if they occupy the same plane of reality. They don’t. It’s like comparing a microscope to a crystal ball. By lumping them together, she deliberately blurs the lines, exploiting the trust she built with the real science to smuggle in dangerous pseudoscience. Where’s the rigorous evidence for medical intuitives diagnosing illness? There isn’t any. Where’s the reproducible proof that manipulating “quantum energy fields” heals disease? It doesn’t exist. This isn’t exploration; it’s endorsement of practices that are, at best, useless and expensive, and at worst, lethal because they divert people from actual, evidence-based medicine.

The most egregious, morally bankrupt part is how she handles stories of rare, unexplained remissions. Presenting these incredibly complex, poorly understood events as simple triumphs of “belief” or “energy healing” is grotesquely irresponsible. It directly feeds the pernicious, victim-blaming myth that if you just believe hard enough, you’ll get well. What about the thousands who believe fiercely, fight desperately, and still die? Does Rankin suggest they simply failed? That their “energy” wasn’t pure enough? This narrative is cruel. It piles guilt onto the suffering. Worse, it plants the seed in vulnerable, desperate people that maybe they should skip the chemo, ditch the surgery, and just find a “healer” who can sense their aura. This isn’t just wrong; it’s potentially murderous negligence coming from someone who knows better. She abuses her position to lend credibility to predators preying on the sick. That’s not medicine. That’s quackery dressed in a lab coat. How deep does the rot go once she starts laying out her “Prescription”? How many more alt-med landmines is she planting for desperate readers to step on? That’s what we need to dig into next. Ready to see how bad it gets?

So, having reeled you in with legit stress science, Rankin pivots to her fix – the “Prescription.” She starts sensibly enough, I’ll grudgingly admit. She tells you to audit your life: job, relationships, purpose, the lot. Identify what drains you, what sparks joy, what old rubbish beliefs are weighing you down. Fine. Basic self-help stuff. Makes sense that chronic misery harms you. Identifying toxic patterns? Yeah, obvious. She pushes lifestyle changes too: sleep, decent food, moving your body, managing stress. This is the thin veneer of respectability. It’s the bait after the initial hook. Most doctors would agree with this surface-level advice. It lulls you into thinking, “Okay, maybe she’s grounded after all.” Don’t be fooled.

Because here’s where the proper con job kicks into high gear. Having lured you into nodding along, Rankin doesn’t recommend proven therapies like CBT or counselling for those deep-seated “blocks.” Oh no. Her go-to solution? Consulting “intuitive healers” and “energy medicine practitioners.” She pushes this absolute garbage with the full weight of her medical credentials. Terms like “medical intuition” fall from her lips like they’re legitimate diagnostic tools. They are not. They are made-up nonsense.

Think about this: A licensed physician is actively telling vulnerable, potentially desperately ill people, to seek out unregulated, unqualified charlatans who claim to “sense energy fields” or diagnose illness through psychic means. This is beyond irresponsible; it’s a profound betrayal of her oath and a clear dereliction of her duty of care. Where is the single shred of credible, reproducible evidence that these “practitioners” can do anything beyond parting fools from their money? There isn’t any. It’s pure fantasy. Worse, it’s predatory fantasy sold by a doctor.

The implications are chilling. Imagine someone with early cancer symptoms. They read Rankin. They trust her MD. They skip the GP. They go to some “medical intuitive” who waves hands over their belly, proclaims it’s “just blocked energy,” sells them £500 of flower essences, and sends them on their way. That cancer grows. It spreads. By the time they see a real doctor, it’s too late. Rankin’s promotion of this quackery makes her complicit in that potential outcome. Framing it as “holistic” or “empowering” is a sickening lie. It is dangerous, evidence-free exploitation masquerading as healthcare. She uses her white coat to launder credibility onto snake oil salesmen.

Right, let’s gut her “spontaneous remission” anecdotes properly, because this is where the book truly stumbles into dangerous territory, disclaimers or not.

Rankin trots out these vanishingly rare cases of “spontaneous remission” – cancers disappearing, terminal illnesses reversing course with no clear medical explanation. On the surface, fascinating medical mysteries. But her presentation? It’s reckless. She frames them, often implicitly and sometimes explicitly through the surrounding narrative, as potential evidence for the power of belief, positive thinking, or “energy medicine” to cure the incurable. That isn’t just unscientific; it’s scientifically illiterate and morally grotesque.

Here’s the brutal truth she glosses over: Correlation is not causation. Just because someone practised visualisation and their rare, unexplained remission happened, does not mean the visualisation caused the remission. Medical science doesn’t understand why these rare events occur in some individuals. Presenting them, nestled amongst chapters on belief and mindset, as potential templates for action or proof of concept for mind-over-matter healing is borderline medical malpractice by proxy. It’s implying a causality that simply doesn’t exist in the evidence.

What does this narrative actually tell the desperately ill person reading it? The subtext screams: “Your negative thoughts, your stress, your lack of belief made you sick. And only unwavering positivity, perfect visualisation, or unlocking some mystical ‘self-healing’ power can save you now.” Think about the sheer, crushing weight of that. It’s victim-blaming of the vilest kind. It piles mountains of undeserved, agonising guilt onto people already enduring unimaginable physical and emotional suffering. “If only I’d been more positive… If only I’d visualised harder… If only I believed more… then maybe I wouldn’t be dying.” That’s not empowerment; it’s psychological torture disguised as hope.

It offers false hope precisely where none should be falsely given. For the vast, overwhelming majority facing serious or terminal illness, rigorous, evidence-based medicine – surgery, chemo, radiotherapy, targeted drugs – offers the only realistic chance, however slim. Suggesting, even indirectly through these miracle stories, that intense belief or alternative practices alone could be the key diverts attention and resources from proven treatments. People delay seeking proper medical care. They abandon life-saving protocols chasing these anecdotal phantoms. That gets people killed.

And yes, Rankin occasionally drops a disclaimer – a line here, a paragraph there – saying “this isn’t a substitute for medical care.” But it rings utterly hollow when page after page is filled with these near-mythical tales of self-cure, presented with breathless wonder. It’s like serving a bowl of poison and saying “Oh, but don’t actually drink it” while waxing lyrical about how delicious it looks. The sheer volume and prominence of these anecdotes, coupled with the book’s core thesis, overwhelm the feeble caveats. It feels like tokenism, a box-ticking exercise to avoid legal liability rather than a genuine, ethical prioritisation of patient safety. For a trained physician, this casual handling of life-and-death narratives isn’t just sloppy; it’s professionally negligent.

It transforms potentially valuable insights about stress management as a complement to conventional care into a dangerous flirtation with medical denialism. Makes you furious, doesn’t it? How can someone with her training be so cavalier with such high stakes? The useful bits about managing stress for better overall health get buried under the avalanche of dangerous, unsupported fantasy.

Final Verdict? Avoid this book like the plague. The tiny sliver of valid points about stress physiology is utterly drowned in a torrent of dangerous, pseudoscientific drivel peddled by someone who absolutely knows better. Rankin abuses her medical authority to lend legitimacy to practices that are, at best, a waste of money, and at worst, lethal. The core message isn’t “mind over medicine”; it’s “gullibility over evidence.” Investing your time, money, or hope in this nonsense isn’t just unwise – given her medical standing, promoting this crap is borderline criminal negligence. She should be ashamed. Don’t buy the hype. Don’t risk your health. What credible reason could possibly justify giving this poisonous book shelf space?

Gods of Silicon: The Dangerous Delusion Behind Kurzweil's AI Prophecy
Book Review: The Problem with Richard Osman's Thursday Murder Club

Reactions

0
0
0
0
0
0
Already reacted for this post.